Presenter : Keith Chen UCLA “ Politics Gets Personal : The Effect of Salient Partisan Differences on Thanksgiving Dinners ” Host
نویسندگان
چکیده
Research on growing American political polarization and antipathy often studies effects on public institutions and political processes. Less attention has been paid to civil institutions like close familial ties. Using smartphone-tracking data and national precinct electoral results, we show time spent at Thanksgiving dinner fell by 20-30 minutes within politically divided families following the divisive 2016 election. This effect survives extensive demographic and spatial controls, as well as comparisons with Thanksgiving 2015. The effect more than doubles in media markets with heavy political advertising, and appears asymmetric. Democratic voters traveled less in 2016, but conditional on travel political differences shortened Thanksgiving dinners more among Republican voters, especially where advertising was heavy. This suggests political polarization degrades close family ties, and political advertising magnifies this effect. One Sentence Summary: Cell-tracking shows that mixed-party families had shorter 2016 Thanksgivings, an effect exacerbated by political advertising.
منابع مشابه
Partisan Politics and Aggregation Failure with Ignorant Voters†
We analyze how voter ignorance effects competing candidates’ policy choices and election outcomes. We show that voter ignorance of policy positions has no effect in large elections provided voters know the preference distribution in the electorate. We then explore a model where voters are ignorant of policy positions and of the preference distribution. In that case limit equilibria (as the numb...
متن کاملPartisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age
This paper examines how financial deregulation and the partisan underpinnings of deregulation shaped the path of income inequality in the United States. Using time series data from 1914 to 2010 we assess the effect of partisan politics on financial deregulation and, in turn, the effect of deregulation on income inequality. We find that financial deregulation has generally declined when Democrat...
متن کاملThe Politics of Consumption Taxes: Globalization and the Median Voter
The regressive nature of consumption taxes poses a challenge to partisan theory. Using data for up to 20 OECD countries in the period 1970-2003 this article aims to explore the question of whether the idea that social democratic governments typically have to compromise on policy goals and core constituency interests to make themselves more appealing to the median voter necessitates the use of r...
متن کاملBridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation.
Three studies link resistance to probative information and intransigence in negotiation to concerns of identity maintenance. Each shows that affirmations of personal integrity (vs. nonaffirmation or threat) can reduce resistance and intransigence but that this effect occurs only when individuals' partisan identity and/or identity-related convictions are made salient. Affirmation made participan...
متن کاملContextual Sources of Ambivalence
When will people become ambivalent about politics? One possibility is that the roots of ambivalence lie within the individual, with differences in political knowledge and attitude strength predicting whether a person internalizes the conflicts of politics. Alternately, attitudinal ambivalence could result from structural differences in the way political choices are presented in the wider politi...
متن کامل